kid's book as supporting text??

[timbo]

So, I was reading my kids a bedtime story last night - a Berenstein Bears book, and I came across this page attached. I thought maybe I could use it next time I testify to uniqueness as another supporting text to Babler & others stating nature does not repeat itself.....
Does thousands of kids reading it count as peer review?

[John Vanderkolk]

Looks like a book I need to buy. Please post the name of the book and publisher info so I can get some for my grandchildren (and me). John Vanderkolk

[timbo]

Looks like a book I need to buy. Please post the name of the book and publisher info so I can get some for my grandchildren (and me). John Vanderkolk

Hey John - the book name is 'Berenstein Bears and The Prize Pumpkin'. I'm sorry, I don't have the publisher info on me at the moment - it was a book that the school loans to the kids to help them learn to read. I could probably get it if you require it.....

[L.J.Steele]

An attorney may not challenge you on theoretical uniqueness, the challenge will be about your ability to reliably discern that uniqueness given the condition of the exemplar -- two very different things. The discussion may be about telling whether something is distorted, but the same, or whether there's a discrepancy that means you can't call it a match, and how you arrived at that conclusion.

[g.]

Thankfully, we have plenty of research that shows that trained experts CAN make those finer distinctions and associations (correct identification decisions) very accurately:
-Evett and Williams (1996); Dror, et al. (2006), Langenburg (2009); Langenburg, et al. (2009); Ulery, et al. (2011); Busey, et al. (2011); Ulery, et al. (2012); Langenburg, et al. (2012); Tangen, et al. (2012); Neumann, et al. (forthcoming, presented at AAFS).

g.

[kevin]

Coming soon:

"The Berenstain Bears and the one discrepancy rule"

[Ken Chappell]

Kids !?, I need that for some of our patrolmen.