Page 3 of 3
Re: My Twitter length rant on the SWGFAST Draft for Comment
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 7:04 pm
by Michele
Since people seemed to have strong opinions on this topic I thought I'd remind everyone that comments on all the SWGFAST Draft for comments need to be submitted by Sept. 6, 2011.
Re: My Twitter length rant on the SWGFAST Draft for Comment
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 8:36 am
by antonroland
Boyd
I am with you on this one although I do appreciate g's inputs.
I have a number of gripes with the SWG XXX publications myself as I have found them to be archaic in their thinking with regards to digital imaging technology and related matters.
Now I readily admit not to have perused them for a while so I would be pleasantly surprised if someone would come along and correct me with a link to updated material that would prove that they have mentally moved into the 2nd half of the last decade...which, as we all should know accounts for a geological age in electronics...
Cheers all and thanks for interesting debate!