Major Case Prints DRAFT Card
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 10:20 pm
Regarding Ed german's site (http://www.onin.com/fp/) that illustrates the draft for Major Case Prints Card.
Too me, it gives the appearance that it dosen't cover all of the areas that the conventional "MCP" cards cover, or allows the areas that can be added (lateral thear, lateral hypothenar and thumb/index interdigital).
The majority of personnel who collect fingerprints are arresting officer/deputy or detention officer who (in my experience) have not grasp that fingerprints (ten-prints) are for arrest records and much less that MCPs are for examinations. I don't know very many LPEs or CSTs who are responsible for collecting 10-print or MCPs, on a routine arrest basis, unless they are collecting them of a court order for biometric or biological identification.
In conclusion, the proposed MCP card appears to be more difficult for the detention officer and arresting officer/deputy to collect, less information area, and on that, it has less potential of being completed on routine bookings and arrests.
Too me, it gives the appearance that it dosen't cover all of the areas that the conventional "MCP" cards cover, or allows the areas that can be added (lateral thear, lateral hypothenar and thumb/index interdigital).
The majority of personnel who collect fingerprints are arresting officer/deputy or detention officer who (in my experience) have not grasp that fingerprints (ten-prints) are for arrest records and much less that MCPs are for examinations. I don't know very many LPEs or CSTs who are responsible for collecting 10-print or MCPs, on a routine arrest basis, unless they are collecting them of a court order for biometric or biological identification.
In conclusion, the proposed MCP card appears to be more difficult for the detention officer and arresting officer/deputy to collect, less information area, and on that, it has less potential of being completed on routine bookings and arrests.