My Twitter length rant on the SWGFAST Draft for Comment

Discuss, Discover, Learn, and Share. Feel free to share information.

Moderators: orrb, saw22

Michele
Posts: 384
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 10:40 am

Re: My Twitter length rant on the SWGFAST Draft for Comment

Post by Michele »

Since people seemed to have strong opinions on this topic I thought I'd remind everyone that comments on all the SWGFAST Draft for comments need to be submitted by Sept. 6, 2011.
Michele
The best way to escape from a problem is to solve it. Alan Saporta
There is nothing so useless as doing efficiently that which should not be done at all. Peter Drucker
(Applies to a full A prior to C and blind verification)
antonroland
Posts: 253
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 5:20 am
Location: Port Elizabeth, South Africa

Re: My Twitter length rant on the SWGFAST Draft for Comment

Post by antonroland »

Boyd

I am with you on this one although I do appreciate g's inputs.

I have a number of gripes with the SWG XXX publications myself as I have found them to be archaic in their thinking with regards to digital imaging technology and related matters.

Now I readily admit not to have perused them for a while so I would be pleasantly surprised if someone would come along and correct me with a link to updated material that would prove that they have mentally moved into the 2nd half of the last decade...which, as we all should know accounts for a geological age in electronics...

Cheers all and thanks for interesting debate!
Make a difference day by day, case by case. If you don't make a difference you don't count.
Post Reply