Although I don't know that it was intended as such, the fingerprint content seems to subtly cast a negative light. I think it's more because of what wasn't stated than what was:
I think there should have been some more information included to explain these statements. The rest of the article can be found at:"We've been doing a lot of child fingerprinting, but that's not always a reliable means of identification," Wagner said.
Joe Polski, chief operations officer for the International Association for Identification, said he would not use the kits but he would not discourage them.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/HEALTH/12/01/dn ... index.html