Fingerprints and Liquid Nitrogen

Discuss, Discover, Learn, and Share. Feel free to share information.

Moderators: orrb, saw22

Post Reply
starsplitter7
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:56 am
Location: Tampa, Florida

Fingerprints and Liquid Nitrogen

Post by starsplitter7 »

Hi there,

I am a new CST in Florida.

I wanted to verify that using liquid nitrogen or dry ice to pull tape apart will not interfere with DNA. (I have previous experience with LN and DI, so I have experience handling both).

Does anyone have a preferred method? Liquid Nitrogen, Dry Ice, or another method to pull tape apart that will not interfere with DNA.

Once the tape is pulled apart, I have used Sticky Side Powder and Crystal Violet to develop the prints.

Thank You, Tanja. (P.S. I did do a quick search in the forum to see if the question had been asked and I couldn't find it, so I apologize if I am bringing up a common question.)
Michele
Posts: 384
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 10:40 am

Post by Michele »

I’ve put tape in a refrigerator or freezer and that seems to work fine. I don’t have any personal knowledge about DNA but I’ve been told that it degrades faster with extreme changes in temperature. If that's true then it seems like a regular freezer would affect the DNA less than liquid nitrogen or dry ice.

For processing the tape, I’m sold on wetwop. Once I tried it, I’ve never gone back to the other methods (except to show people how much better the results are with wetwop).
Michele
The best way to escape from a problem is to solve it. Alan Saporta
There is nothing so useless as doing efficiently that which should not be done at all. Peter Drucker
(Applies to a full A prior to C and blind verification)
starsplitter7
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:56 am
Location: Tampa, Florida

DNA and LN

Post by starsplitter7 »

Thank you so much for replying. I appreciate your input. I like Wetwop along with Sticky Side Powder.
mdavis
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 6:07 am
Contact:

Post by mdavis »

My best results have been to use glue fuming in a vacuum chamber, followed by fluorescent dye staining, usually a mix of Ardrox, BY40 and sometimes R6G in either an ethanol or water carrier. It doesn't seem to matter much how the tape is separated. Adhesive to adhesive bonds are almost always a loss. The more slowly you pull the tape, the less damage there is to the adhesive layer during removal and the less likely you will separate the adhesive layer from its backing or disrupt the integrity of the adhesive surface. It also depends on the quality and brand of tape (duct tape for example varies widely) as to how well the adhesive layer is bonded to the backing, how substantial the cloth mesh is, and how much damage is done in removing it from various surfaces. I have not had much luck with wet-powder methods, although some earlier experiments did show that the brand of powder gave differing results with various wetting agents.
kevin
Posts: 144
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 3:37 pm
Location: elsewhere

adhesive residue

Post by kevin »

been finding that sticky side will sometimes develope prints on the non-adhesive side alot of the time. I'm sure it is just transferred adhesive residue in most cases, but CA won't catch it and I stay away from dye staining it. Tends to happen with heavy adhesive like duct tape and not so much on a plastic, clear or electrical. Sticky side works best for me, but I think liqi nox would work well too.
Post Reply