After reviewing the ideas for a name change from Major Case Prints to something like the popular vote of "Complete Palmar Exemplars" (Complex) I was wondering what if you did not need or desire a "Complete set." Would you still call them "complete." I know that you all have heard this many times from me, and I hate to bore you, but should we not consider something that allows for the variation in each case. Sometimes we would like as much "completeness" as possible, other times we may just need a supplement to what we already have on file. I do however like the idea of "Complex" as a complex is "an interrelated set." A PALMAR COMPLEX SET or PALMAR COMPLEX EXEMPLARS will allow for case (need) variation, yet will not require that the set be "complete." I know that many agencies have many palmar exemplar sets on individuals, yet may only need a specific area. Of course, if you really think about it very few "major case print sets" are really complete! Again, sorry to bore you, but this is where the PZ-Code could be implemented with "complete" effectiveness.
Thanks
Craig Coppock