Hello All
So I am getting ready to take a deeper look at my own prints in terms of possible variance in Level 3 detail.
At this point I am very much finding ways how to do it and gathering raw data. Also mostly discovering ways of how NOT to do it..
Any comments / encouragement / critique highly welcomed.
Third level detail - the first baby steps of an ambitious project…
-
antonroland
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 5:20 am
- Location: Port Elizabeth, South Africa
Third level detail - the first baby steps of an ambitious project…
Make a difference day by day, case by case. If you don't make a difference you don't count.
-
antonroland
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 5:20 am
- Location: Port Elizabeth, South Africa
Re: Third level detail - the first baby steps of an ambitious project…
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Make a difference day by day, case by case. If you don't make a difference you don't count.
-
antonroland
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 5:20 am
- Location: Port Elizabeth, South Africa
Re: Third level detail - the first baby steps of an ambitious project…
So, broadly the plan is this…
Since it is generally accepted that the epidermal friction ridge skin renews itself in around 30 days, I am planning to take my own prints roughly every 30 days.
I started on 19 June and had the first repeat yesterday 15 July.
I am focusing on my thumbs for now and I am finding a lot of practicalities I can improve on. A4 copier paper is NOT as smooth as one would hope for and lighting it can also be a challenge given the close working distance of most macro lenses.
Happy days refining the collection of raw data…
Since it is generally accepted that the epidermal friction ridge skin renews itself in around 30 days, I am planning to take my own prints roughly every 30 days.
I started on 19 June and had the first repeat yesterday 15 July.
I am focusing on my thumbs for now and I am finding a lot of practicalities I can improve on. A4 copier paper is NOT as smooth as one would hope for and lighting it can also be a challenge given the close working distance of most macro lenses.
Happy days refining the collection of raw data…
Make a difference day by day, case by case. If you don't make a difference you don't count.
-
antonroland
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 5:20 am
- Location: Port Elizabeth, South Africa
Re: Third level detail - the first baby steps of an ambitious project…
Another interesting challenge identified…
Using a Nikon D700, which is a lovely camera, I am finding that 12Mp images might not give me the desired degree of enlargement AND the image quality I wish to obtain so now I am exploring 2400dpi tiff scans on an Epson V750 flatbed scanner.
The lens at my disposal is Nikon’s very capable nano-coated 60mm f/2,8 macro 1:1.
The problem here is that the lens at 1:1 is about 3-4 cm / 1,5 - 1,75 inches away from the subject matter.
This makes it almost impossible to light the print properly without showing paper surface detail.
Maybe a Canon 5D Mk4 and a 100mm macro lens will solve this in a number of ways but let’s first see what the scans give me.
Oh well, who said getting there is half the fun?
Using a Nikon D700, which is a lovely camera, I am finding that 12Mp images might not give me the desired degree of enlargement AND the image quality I wish to obtain so now I am exploring 2400dpi tiff scans on an Epson V750 flatbed scanner.
The lens at my disposal is Nikon’s very capable nano-coated 60mm f/2,8 macro 1:1.
The problem here is that the lens at 1:1 is about 3-4 cm / 1,5 - 1,75 inches away from the subject matter.
This makes it almost impossible to light the print properly without showing paper surface detail.
Maybe a Canon 5D Mk4 and a 100mm macro lens will solve this in a number of ways but let’s first see what the scans give me.
Oh well, who said getting there is half the fun?
Make a difference day by day, case by case. If you don't make a difference you don't count.