VOTE: Is consideration of the acronym important or not?

Discuss, Discover, Learn, and Share. Feel free to share information.

Moderators: orrb, saw22

Post Reply

Do you feel it's important to have a term with a legitimate acronym or would you not take into account the acronym when choosing a new term?

Poll ended at Sun Oct 16, 2005 1:36 pm

I would consider the acronym
7
30%
I would not consider the acronym
16
70%
 
Total votes: 23

Kasey Wertheim
Posts: 161
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 6:55 am

VOTE: Is consideration of the acronym important or not?

Post by Kasey Wertheim »

Do you feel that it is important to consider the acronym when choosing a term to potentially replace "Major Case Prints", or would you completely disregard the acronym and choose only on the basis of the meaning of the proposed term?
DimWit481
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 10:06 am

Post by DimWit481 »

My sense is that people were trying too hard to make the acronym into a word. Forget cute! A non-word acronym that accurately _and concisely_ describes the exemplars is more important.
Gerald Clough
Posts: 557
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 6:27 am
Location: Lockhart, Texas
Contact:

Post by Gerald Clough »

An acronym is unimportant and, I think, potentially counterproductive. Many of us depend heavily or totally upon jail personnel, sometimes lightly trained, to secure prints. A descriptive term tht clearly conveys what is desired seems far more useful than an acronym that may or may not be familiar to the person securing the prints.
"Nothing has any value, unless you know you can give it up."
Marci Glover
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 6:04 am
Location: Southern Illinois Forensic Science Center

Major Case Prints

Post by Marci Glover »

Although the "Major" in Major Case Prints tends to be confusing, it is the training for those taking the prints that plays the larger roll, not the name that we give them, acronym or not.
Post Reply